Waiting for judicial action from Shehbaz Sharif: David Rose
If Shahbaz Sharif really wanted to sue me and the Mail, he would have to get his wife and children to explain to the court why they accepted huge foreign cash "investments" from people who were actually penniless hawkers, pappadom sellers, etc. Maybe they will. We shall see.
— David Rose (@DavidRoseUK) August 17, 2019
Earlier, another tweet, the Daily Mail investigative reporter said, "Hello Pakistani journalists: the reason the Mail has not yet replied to Shahbaz Sharif's lawyers is that I have only just returned from leave. We will shortly. And I assure you, my article was NOT fabricated, and we are not about to admit that it was."I wrote an article last year on another member of the Sharif family and his unexplained wealth. Do please remind me of his current address. I don't think it's anywhere in Park Lane or Mayfair. And doesn't his daughter face some issues too? https://t.co/UWQkt9ChSd
— David Rose (@DavidRoseUK) August 17, 2019
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvMyz_EmpLk On July 15, David Rose affirmed that he stood behind his story published in Daily Mail. In an exclusively interview with 92 News program “Hard Talk”, the UK newspaper journalist challenged Shehbaz Sharif to file law suit in the British court. He also claimed that he has all evidences against Shehbaz Sharif. David Rose said that he already wrote a report against former prime minister Nawaz Sharif but no one approach to the court against his story. He also rejected the claims of PML-N about the story and said that he had contact of PML-N spokesperson Marriyum Aurangzeb many times but she didn’t respond. “I tried many times to get the narrative of PML-N and did phone calls, messages to Marriyum Aurangzeb, but she refused to comment over it,” he said. The British investigative journalist had said that the Department for International Development (DFID) “rebuttal” of his story about Shahbaz Sharif is nothing of the kind. He took his twitter after United Kingdom’s DFID discredited an article published by “Daily Mail” and said, “The DIFD’s rebuttal merely repeats their statement quoted in the article, and claims the piece contains no evidence about the earthquake fund. Read it. It does. Poor show. More wasted cash!”Hello Pakistani journalists: the reason the Mail has not yet replied to Shahbaz Sharif's lawyers is that I have only just returned from leave. We will shortly. And I assure you, my article was NOT fabricated, and we are not about to admit that it was. https://t.co/8MMkCkErCv
— David Rose (@DavidRoseUK) August 17, 2019